Platform Architecture & Advisory
Architecture, governance, integration patterns, ownership, and roadmap decisions need senior platform judgment.
View related detailsArchitecture, scaling, upgrade planning, new installations, workflow/forms delivery, performance recovery, rescue, and modernization support from a former Nintex Principal Consultant and former K2 Technical Manager.
The work may be a new workflow build, an upgrade, a scaling concern, a platform-health question, a production rescue, or a migration decision. The first step is to understand the platform reality and the business risk.
Review platform topology, integrations, governance, delivery model, and roadmap before a decision becomes expensive to unwind.
Plan and implement maintainable K2/Nintex workflows, forms, approvals, routing, data access, and deployment patterns.
Prepare installations and upgrades, diagnose performance, review scaling limits, and reduce platform-operating risk.
Stabilize urgent production issues or decide what to retire, rebuild, migrate, optimize, or keep running.
Services are written around outcomes, deliverables, and buyer fit so CTOs, platform owners, delivery leads, recruiters, and procurement teams can quickly understand the engagement shape.
Architecture, governance, integration patterns, ownership, and roadmap decisions need senior platform judgment.
View related detailsProduction behavior is fragile, scaling limits are unclear, and performance issues are hard to separate from design issues.
View related detailsInstallations and upgrades involve prerequisites, compatibility, service accounts, SharePoint apps, identity, and rollback planning.
View related detailsNew workflow and form builds need maintainable design, clean data boundaries, testable logic, and supportable ownership.
View related detailsNot every workflow should be migrated; teams need a decision model for rebuild, retire, replace, stabilize, or move.
View related detailsBusiness-critical workflow issues need senior diagnosis, stakeholder coordination, and practical remediation.
View related detailsInternal teams need repeatable patterns, governance, documentation, and confidence to own workflows after delivery.
View related detailsPlatform decisions, vendor conversations, architecture reviews, delivery oversight, and escalation support need experienced guidance.
View related detailsIdentify platform, version, workflow/form scope, urgency, business impact, and owner needs.
Review architecture, workflows, forms, integrations, dependencies, performance, and governance.
Choose build, optimize, upgrade, stabilize, migrate, retire, or advisory paths.
Support implementation, testing, troubleshooting, deployment, or integrator oversight.
Leave documented decisions, working solutions, and maintainable platform ownership.
Prior work includes regulated banking, telecommunications, production incidents, renewal support, and cross-functional enterprise delivery. Details are anonymized to protect client confidentiality.
The team needed confidence that the platform could support enterprise controls and complex deployment realities.
Technical, licensing, legal, customer success, and account stakeholders needed alignment through a months-long cycle.
Production workflow behavior was affecting operations and required senior platform troubleshooting.
Engagements were completed during prior employment where applicable. Project-specific references can be discussed privately where appropriate.

Steve spent more than a decade inside the K2 and Nintex ecosystem, most recently as Principal Consultant at Nintex and previously as Technical Manager and Senior Consultant at K2.
He helps enterprise teams separate real platform limitations from architecture issues, configuration issues, design mistakes, support exposure, upgrade constraints, licensing traps, and avoidable modernization risk.
The focus is practical delivery: working workflows and forms, documented decisions, and solutions your team can actually own.
No. Migration is one lane. I also help with K2/Nintex architecture, scaling, upgrades, installations, workflow and form implementation, production rescue, governance, and team enablement.
An architecture review is useful before new workflow delivery, a platform upgrade, a major integration, a renewal, a scale-up, or inherited ownership of an existing K2/Nintex estate.
Yes. Engagements can cover process discovery, workflow and form design, data and integration planning, build support, testing, deployment, and handoff.
Yes. Upgrade planning can include current-state review, prerequisites, compatibility, environment readiness, service accounts, SharePoint app considerations, validation, and rollback planning.
Start with an inventory, identify business-critical workflows, rank risk, and decide which workflows should be retired, rebuilt, migrated, upgraded, or stabilized.
Microsoft retired SharePoint 2013 Workflow for SharePoint Online. Teams still relying on those automations need a replacement or remediation plan.
No. Power Automate may be appropriate for some workflows, while Nintex Automation Cloud, Nintex Automation K2, custom services, or retirement may fit others.
We review platform, version, business process, workflow/form scope, urgency, ownership, access model, deadline, and whether architecture, health, implementation, upgrade, rescue, or migration support makes sense.
If you are planning architecture, scaling, upgrades, installation, workflow/forms delivery, rescue, governance, or migration work, book a consultation directly or send details by email. The first conversation is focused on fit, urgency, and the best next step.
Use the first call to clarify platform/version, business impact, workflow or form scope, urgency, access boundaries, and whether architecture, implementation, upgrade, rescue, modernization, or advisory support is the right next step.
If the popup is blocked, open calendly.com/stevebarnard/initial-consultation.